NetBSD Problem Report #32213

From www@netbsd.org  Fri Dec  2 06:30:22 2005
Return-Path: <www@netbsd.org>
Received: by narn.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 31301)
	id A1D8763B883; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 06:30:22 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20051202063022.A1D8763B883@narn.netbsd.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Dec 2005 06:30:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: dlg@dorkzilla.org
Reply-To: dlg@dorkzilla.org
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: 3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         32213
>Category:       port-sgimips
>Synopsis:       3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    port-sgimips-maintainer
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Dec 02 06:31:00 +0000 2005
>Closed-Date:    Sat Feb 21 07:28:35 +0000 2009
>Last-Modified:  Sat Feb 21 11:10:03 +0000 2009
>Originator:     david l goodrich
>Release:        3.0_RC5
>Organization:
>Environment:
unknown, cannot complete install process.  Attempting to install 3.0_RC5 from ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/
> hinv
                   System: IP32
                Processor: 174 Mhz R10000, with FPU
     Primary I-cache size: 32 Kbytes
     Primary D-cache size: 32 Kbytes
     Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
              Memory size: 256 Mbytes
                 Graphics: CRM, Rev C
                    Audio: A3 version 1
                SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(2)
               SCSI CDROM: scsi(0)cdrom(4)
>
>Description:
when attempting to install 3.0_RC5 to an SGI O2 via either FTP or NFS, installation fails while extracting files.  If using FTP, the download is successful.  It is just the extracting phase that causes the machine to reboot.
>How-To-Repeat:
attempt to install 3.0_RC5 on an SGI O2
>Fix:

>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:
From: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-sgimips/32213: 3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:10:43 -0600

 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
 --------------enigD0AF9B7194E7A6745D563E3C
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 gnats-admin@netbsd.org wrote:
 > Thank you very much for your problem report.
 > It has the internal identification `port-sgimips/32213'.
 > The individual assigned to look at your
 > report is: port-sgimips-maintainer. 
 > 
 > 
 >>Category:       port-sgimips
 >>Responsible:    port-sgimips-maintainer
 >>Synopsis:       3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
 >>Arrival-Date:   Fri Dec 02 06:31:00 +0000 2005
 > 
 > 
 > 

 3.0_RC1 [1] will install and boot on the same machine.  the dmesg is
 available at http://www.dorkzilla.org/~dlg/neptune_dmesg.txt
   --david


 1. as cross-built on an x86 by myself and made available to the public
 at ftp://ftp.dorkzilla.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-3.0_RC1/sgimips/

 --------------enigD0AF9B7194E7A6745D563E3C
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

 iD8DBQFDkSjXHDmo5jqnP4QRAmPUAJ9Jo8WzySUGR41o6OCGen9SzaV4eACfQPNQ
 W7cARNq9HMOkNo4LlVNK2r8=
 =fjXs
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 --------------enigD0AF9B7194E7A6745D563E3C--

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:08:41 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Does this still happen on 5.0?
(Given how much attention sgimips seems to get, it probably does, but it's
worth trying...)


From: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-sgimips-maintainer@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org,
	gnats-admin@netbsd.org, dholland@NetBSD.org, dlg@dorkzilla.org
Subject: Re: port-sgimips/32213 (3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:28:04 -0600

 On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:08:41AM +0000, dholland@NetBSD.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: 3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
 > State-Changed-When: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:08:41 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Does this still happen on 5.0?
 > (Given how much attention sgimips seems to get, it probably does, but it's
 > worth trying...)
 > 
 5.0_RC2 installed successfully:

 neptune# dmesg | egrep ^cpu.\ at
 cpu0 at mainbus0: MIPS R10000 CPU (0x926) Rev. 2.6 with built-in
 FPU Rev. 0.0
 neptune# uname -a
 NetBSD neptune.dsrw.org 5.0_RC2 NetBSD 5.0_RC2 (GENERIC32_IP3x) #0: Mon Feb  9 1
 3:04:50 UTC 2009  builds@b6.netbsd.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-0-RC2/sgimips/20
 0902090142Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-0-RC2/src/sys/arch/sgimips/compile/GENER
 IC32_IP3x sgimips
 neptune# 

 will attempt building the OS tonight, to see if it crashes.
   --david

From: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>
To: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, port-sgimips-maintainer@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, dholland@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-sgimips/32213 (3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:34:44 -0600

 On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 07:28:04PM -0600, david l goodrich wrote:
 > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:08:41AM +0000, dholland@NetBSD.org wrote:
 > > Synopsis: 3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips
 > > 
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > > State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
 > > State-Changed-When: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:08:41 +0000
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > Does this still happen on 5.0?
 > > (Given how much attention sgimips seems to get, it probably does, but it's
 > > worth trying...)
 > > 
 > 5.0_RC2 installed successfully:
 > 
 > neptune# dmesg | egrep ^cpu.\ at
 > cpu0 at mainbus0: MIPS R10000 CPU (0x926) Rev. 2.6 with built-in
 > FPU Rev. 0.0
 > neptune# uname -a
 > NetBSD neptune.dsrw.org 5.0_RC2 NetBSD 5.0_RC2 (GENERIC32_IP3x) #0: Mon Feb  9 1
 > 3:04:50 UTC 2009  builds@b6.netbsd.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-0-RC2/sgimips/20
 > 0902090142Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-0-RC2/src/sys/arch/sgimips/compile/GENER
 > IC32_IP3x sgimips
 > neptune# 
 > 
 > will attempt building the OS tonight, to see if it crashes.
 >   --david

 It is still building, slowly, with src in NFS and obj on local
 disk - it's only a 4gb drive.

 But I noticed the error:
  crime: cpu error 4 at address 71181796

 I wonder if that's OS or hardware-based.
   --david

From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
To: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, port-sgimips-maintainer@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, dholland@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-sgimips/32213 (3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on
	port-sgimips)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:12:11 +0000

 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:34:44PM -0600, david l goodrich wrote:
  > > will attempt building the OS tonight, to see if it crashes.
  > 
  > It is still building, slowly, with src in NFS and obj on local
  > disk - it's only a 4gb drive.
  > 
  > But I noticed the error:
  >  crime: cpu error 4 at address 71181796
  > 
  > I wonder if that's OS or hardware-based.

 It looks to be a hardware diagnostic (see sys/arch/sgimips/dev/crime.c)
 but I don't particularly know what to make of it. Hope it doesn't mean
 your HW is getting ready to pack up.

 If it seems to be a problem, please open a new PR; this one I guess
 can be closed.

 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland@netbsd.org

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:28:35 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in 5.0. ober@ says the crime message is harmless, too.


From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
To: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
Cc: david l goodrich <dlg@dorkzilla.org>, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
	port-sgimips-maintainer@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org,
	gnats-admin@netbsd.org, dholland@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-sgimips/32213 (3.0_RC5 base.tgz will not un-tar on port-sgimips)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:09:18 +0100

 On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 07:12:11AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 > It looks to be a hardware diagnostic (see sys/arch/sgimips/dev/crime.c)
 > but I don't particularly know what to make of it. Hope it doesn't mean
 > your HW is getting ready to pack up.

 I see this on my R10K O2 too, and always ignored it ;-)

 Martin

>Unformatted:

Home	PR Database Search