NetBSD Problem Report #39505

From www@NetBSD.org  Mon Sep  8 18:02:37 2008
Return-Path: <www@NetBSD.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by narn.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D6863B8A9
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2008 18:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20080908180236.E334263B853@narn.NetBSD.org>
Date: Mon,  8 Sep 2008 18:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp
Reply-To: kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: saost(4) supports pxa25x and pxa270 together
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         39505
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       saost(4) supports pxa25x and pxa270 together
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    kern-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Sep 08 18:05:01 +0000 2008
>Originator:     KIYOHARA Takashi
>Release:        -current
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
The saost(4) of ARM sa11xx is supported in the pxaip(4) of xscale. It will be attached in both PXA25x and PXA270. 
And, when run-time it, PXA25x and PXA270 can be judged from the macro named CPU_IS_PXA250 and CPU_IS_PXA270. 
However, because saost(4) doesn't use this, it is likely to become a compile error.

Please correct this.
>How-To-Repeat:
For instance, please add "options CPU_XSCALE_PXA270" to arch/evbarm/conf/GUMSTIX.  And, please config/make it. 

# Our GUMSTIX will supports 250 and 270 boards.
# My source tree already supported.  ;-)

>Fix:
See this mail.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-arm/2008/08/20/msg000343.html

Home	PR Database Search