NetBSD Problem Report #46881

From msaitoh@execsw.org  Fri Aug 31 01:16:39 2012
Return-Path: <msaitoh@execsw.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [149.20.53.66])
	by www.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3775C63B86D
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20120831011637.7BC0C439854@vslock.execsw.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:16:37 +0900 (JST)
From: msaitoh@execsw.org
Reply-To: msaitoh@execsw.org
To: gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org
Subject: extra "UCode version: ?" output on some archs.
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.95

>Number:         46881
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       extra "UCode version: ?" output on some archs.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    bin-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Aug 31 01:20:00 +0000 2012
>Originator:     SAITOH Masanobu
>Release:        -current
>Organization:
-----------------------------------------------
		SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh@netbsd.org)
>Environment:
	tested netbsd-6 (and -current?) on evbarm
Architecture: arm
Machine: evbarm
>Description:
	"cpuctl identify 0" on evbarm shows:

	dreamplug# cpuctl identify 0
	CPU identification not implemented for this architecture.
	cpu0: UCode version: ?

>How-To-Repeat:
	cpuctl identify 0 on evbarm or some archs.
>Fix:
	I think we should not show the microcode version on architectures
	that don't support it (to check ENODEV or something?)

Home	PR Database Search