NetBSD Problem Report #46960

From www@NetBSD.org  Sat Sep 15 22:12:12 2012
Return-Path: <www@NetBSD.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [149.20.53.66])
	by www.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020B463CC85
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:12:12 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20120915221211.29FDE63BA3B@www.NetBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:12:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: davshao@gmail.com
Reply-To: davshao@gmail.com
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         46960
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Sep 15 22:15:00 +0000 2012
>Last-Modified:  Wed Sep 19 17:10:03 +0000 2012
>Originator:     David Shao
>Release:        DragonFly 3.1-DEVEL i386 and x86_64
>Organization:
>Environment:
DragonFly 3.1-DEVEL i386 and x86_64
>Description:
commit 04ecb2eb... Sat Sep 15 13:31:37 2012 -0700
current pkgsrc on DragonFly

pkg_rolling-replace -uv

For glib-2.32.4

  GEN    gio-public-headers.txt
Making all in tests
Shared object "libffi.so.5" not found, required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
...


>How-To-Repeat:
commit 04ecb2eb... Sat Sep 15 13:31:37 2012 -0700
current pkgsrc on DragonFly

pkg_rolling-replace -uv
>Fix:

>Audit-Trail:
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/46960: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required
 by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:41:08 +0000

 On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:15:01PM +0000, davshao@gmail.com wrote:
  > pkg_rolling-replace -uv
  > 
  > For glib-2.32.4
  > 
  >   GEN    gio-public-headers.txt
  > Making all in tests
  > Shared object "libffi.so.5" not found, required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
  > ...

 That shouldn't be possible... did you maybe forget to make clean?

 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland@netbsd.org

From: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/46960: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required
 by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:50:41 +0900

 On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:45:02 +0900, David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org> wrote:

 >  On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:15:01PM +0000, davshao@gmail.com wrote:
 >   > pkg_rolling-replace -uv
 >   >
 >   > For glib-2.32.4
 >   >
 >   >   GEN    gio-public-headers.txt
 >   > Making all in tests
 >   > Shared object "libffi.so.5" not found, required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
 >   > ...
 > That shouldn't be possible... did you maybe forget to make clean?

 With pkg_rolling-replace, `make clean' will be executed first.

 Probably someone refers installed libgobject-2.0.so.0 instead of built one,
 but I don't know the reason why...

 -- 
 OBATA Akio / obache@NetBSD.org

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/46960: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required
 by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:14:12 +0000

 On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 02:55:02AM +0000, OBATA Akio wrote:
  >>> Shared object "libffi.so.5" not found, required by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
  >>> ...
  >> That shouldn't be possible... did you maybe forget to make clean?
  >  
  >  With pkg_rolling-replace, `make clean' will be executed first.

 That's what I thought, but...

  >  Probably someone refers installed libgobject-2.0.so.0 instead of built one,
  >  but I don't know the reason why...

 I guess, but bl3 is mostly pretty good at preventing that.

 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland@netbsd.org

From: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/46960: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required
 by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:28:21 +0900

 On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:15:04 +0900, David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org> wrote:

 >   >  Probably someone refers installed libgobject-2.0.so.0 instead of built one,
 >   >  but I don't know the reason why...
 > I guess, but bl3 is mostly pretty good at preventing that.

 I ever seen that pkg_rolling-replace start to replace a package before
 BUILD_DEPNEDS packages, then failed to execute tools...
 bl3 will not hide runtime search path (RPATH).

 -- 
 OBATA Akio / obache@NetBSD.org

From: David Shao <davshao@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/46960: libffi update glib2 "libffi.so.5" not found required
 by "libgobject-2.0.so.0"
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:06:03 -0700

 I found the most reliable way to correct the problem to be:

 pkg_delete -r libffi

 and then rebuild the deleted packages.  These packages were going to
 have to be rebuilt anyway if using pkg_rolling-replace -uv.

Home	PR Database Search