NetBSD Problem Report #48215
From ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp Mon Sep 16 03:57:28 2013
Return-Path: <ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [149.20.53.66])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "mail.NetBSD.org", Issuer "Postmaster NetBSD.org" (verified OK))
by mollari.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76F371189
for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:57:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20130916035725.7D57A20270031@mail.SiriusCloud.jp>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:57:25 +0900 (JST)
From: ryoon@NetBSD.org
Reply-To: ryoon@NetBSD.org
To: gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org
Subject: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.95
>Number: 48215
>Notify-List: bsiegert@NetBSD.org
>Category: port-arm
>Synopsis: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: port-arm-maintainer
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Sep 16 04:00:00 +0000 2013
>Closed-Date: Sat Aug 07 02:38:05 +0000 2021
>Last-Modified: Sat Aug 07 02:38:05 +0000 2021
>Originator: Ryo ONODERA
>Release: NetBSD 6.99.23
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD tellurium.elements.tetera.org 6.99.23 NetBSD 6.99.23 (DTRACE) #4: Tue Sep 3 09:25:35 JST 2013 ryo_on@tellurium.elements.tetera.org:/usr/obj/amd64/sys/arch/amd64/compile/DTRACE amd64
Architecture: x86_64
Machine: amd64
>Description:
After http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2013/09/14/msg047577.html ,
pkg_add fails with the following error.
$ pkg_add /usr/pkgbin/All/digest-20121220.tgz
pkg_add: Warning: package `digest-20121220' was built for a platform:
pkg_add: NetBSD/earmv6hf 6.99.23 (pkg) vs. NetBSD/earm 6.99.23 (this host)
pkg_add: 1 package addition failed
$ make -V MACHINE_ARCH
earmv6hf
$ uname -p
earmv6hf
I cannot find origin of "earm", sadly.
>How-To-Repeat:
Do "make install" in any package directory, for example,
pkgsrc/pkgtools/digest.
Or make package and pkg_add.
>Fix:
I have no idea.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
ryoon@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:45:41 -0700
On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:00 PM, ryoon@NetBSD.org wrote:
>> Number: 48215
>> Category: port-arm
>> Synopsis: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
>> Confidential: no
>> Severity: serious
>> Priority: medium
>> Responsible: port-arm-maintainer
>> State: open
>> Class: sw-bug
>> Submitter-Id: net
>> Arrival-Date: Mon Sep 16 04:00:00 +0000 2013
>> Originator: Ryo ONODERA
>> Release: NetBSD 6.99.23
>> Organization:
> =09
>> Environment:
> =09
> =09
> System: NetBSD tellurium.elements.tetera.org 6.99.23 NetBSD 6.99.23 =
(DTRACE) #4: Tue Sep 3 09:25:35 JST 2013 =
ryo_on@tellurium.elements.tetera.org:/usr/obj/amd64/sys/arch/amd64/compile=
/DTRACE amd64
> Architecture: x86_64
> Machine: amd64
>> Description:
> After =
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2013/09/14/msg047577.html ,
> pkg_add fails with the following error.
>=20
> $ pkg_add /usr/pkgbin/All/digest-20121220.tgz
> pkg_add: Warning: package `digest-20121220' was built for a platform:
> pkg_add: NetBSD/earmv6hf 6.99.23 (pkg) vs. NetBSD/earm 6.99.23 (this =
host)
> pkg_add: 1 package addition failed
>=20
> $ make -V MACHINE_ARCH
> earmv6hf
>=20
> $ uname -p
> earmv6hf
>=20
> I cannot find origin of "earm", sadly.
> =09
>> How-To-Repeat:
> Do "make install" in any package directory, for example,
> pkgsrc/pkgtools/digest.
> Or make package and pkg_add.
> =09
>> Fix:
> =09
> I have no idea.
>=20
>> Unformatted:
That seems to be a pkg tools program, not an arm problem.=
From: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:53:43 +0900 (JST)
Hi,
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>, Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:45:41 -0700
> That seems to be a pkg tools program, not an arm problem.
Thank you.
I will investigate pkg_install deeper.
--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
From: Nick Hudson <skrll@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp>, port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:09:23 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040706010803020104010603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 09/16/13 06:55, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-arm/48215; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp>
> To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
> current
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:53:43 +0900 (JST)
>
> Hi,
>
> From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>, Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:45:41 -0700
>
> > That seems to be a pkg tools program, not an arm problem.
>
> Thank you.
> I will investigate pkg_install deeper.
Something like the attached diff should fix this. I didn't even compile
test it, though.
Nick
--------------040706010803020104010603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
name="diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="diff"
Index: pkgtools/pkg_install/files/add/perform.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/pkgtools/pkg_install/files/add/perform.c,v
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -p -u -r1.105 perform.c
--- pkgtools/pkg_install/files/add/perform.c 2 Sep 2013 10:28:44 -0000 1.105
+++ pkgtools/pkg_install/files/add/perform.c 16 Sep 2013 08:05:25 -0000
@@ -908,8 +908,17 @@ check_platform(struct pkg_task *pkg)
if (OverrideMachine != NULL)
effective_arch = OverrideMachine;
- else
- effective_arch = MACHINE_ARCH;
+ else {
+ static char machine_arch_buf[sizeof(utsname.machine)];
+ const int mib[2] = { CTL_HW, HW_MACHINE_ARCH };
+ size_t len = sizeof(machine_arch_buf);
+
+ if (sysctl(mib, __arraycount(mib), machine_arch_buf,
+ &len, NULL, 0) == 0)
+ effective_arch = machine_arch_buf;
+ else
+ effective_arch = MACHINE_ARCH;
+ }
/* If either the OS or arch are different, bomb */
if (strcmp(OPSYS_NAME, pkg->buildinfo[BI_OPSYS]) ||
--------------040706010803020104010603--
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:55:39 +0000
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:10:01AM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Something like the attached diff should fix this. I didn't even compile
> test it, though.
It's probably better to try to arrange the build so MACHINE_ARCH
contains the right string.
calling sysctl directly will probably make for compile-time fun on
Solaris and other legacy platforms.
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:10:17 -0700
On Sep 16, 2013, at 8:00 AM, David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org> =
wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-arm/48215; it has been noted =
by GNATS.
>=20
> From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
> To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Cc:=20
> Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent =
NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
> current
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:55:39 +0000
>=20
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:10:01AM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote:
>> Something like the attached diff should fix this. I didn't even =
compile=20
>> test it, though.
>=20
> It's probably better to try to arrange the build so MACHINE_ARCH
> contains the right string.
>=20
> calling sysctl directly will probably make for compile-time fun on
> Solaris and other legacy platforms.
So conditionalize it with #ifdef NETBSD_SOURCE / #endif=
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:43:35 +0000
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:15:00PM +0000, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > It's probably better to try to arrange the build so MACHINE_ARCH
> > contains the right string.
> >
> > calling sysctl directly will probably make for compile-time fun on
> > Solaris and other legacy platforms.
>
> So conditionalize it with #ifdef NETBSD_SOURCE / #endif=
Or maybe fix it right?
The build inherits MACHINE_ARCH from the environment, which gets it
from the nbmake wrapper. If it's wrong there, that seems like a bug.
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org
Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:19:45 +1000
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:15:00PM +0000, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > > It's probably better to try to arrange the build so MACHINE_ARCH
> > > contains the right string.
> > >
> > > calling sysctl directly will probably make for compile-time fun on
> > > Solaris and other legacy platforms.
> >
> > So conditionalize it with #ifdef NETBSD_SOURCE / #endif=
>
> Or maybe fix it right?
>
> The build inherits MACHINE_ARCH from the environment, which gets it
> from the nbmake wrapper. If it's wrong there, that seems like a bug.
this has to do with the value exportd by <sys/param.h>, not
the value set by the build.
since these binaries are always going to report the same value,
i suspect that fixing arm/param.h to report the right value
depending on the compiler options would fix the problem without
having to patch every program that uses them to use sysctl on
netbsd...
.mrg.
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:44:00 -0700
On Sep 16, 2013, at 8:19 PM, matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:15:00PM +0000, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>>> It's probably better to try to arrange the build so MACHINE_ARCH
>>>> contains the right string.
>>>>
>>>> calling sysctl directly will probably make for compile-time fun on
>>>> Solaris and other legacy platforms.
>>>
>>> So conditionalize it with #ifdef NETBSD_SOURCE / #endif=
>>
>> Or maybe fix it right?
>>
>> The build inherits MACHINE_ARCH from the environment, which gets it
>> from the nbmake wrapper. If it's wrong there, that seems like a bug.
>
> this has to do with the value exportd by <sys/param.h>, not
> the value set by the build.
>
> since these binaries are always going to report the same value,
> i suspect that fixing arm/param.h to report the right value
> depending on the compiler options would fix the problem without
> having to patch every program that uses them to use sysctl on
> netbsd...
As I said on tech-userlevel, it can't be done at the compiler level.
The alternative is to add CPPFLAGS+= -DMACHINE_ARCH=\"${MACHINE_ARCH}\"
to the lib Makefile.
And not have arm params.h #undef it.
From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org
Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:48:51 -0400
On Sep 17, 1:19pm, mrg@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
| since these binaries are always going to report the same value,
| i suspect that fixing arm/param.h to report the right value
| depending on the compiler options would fix the problem without
| having to patch every program that uses them to use sysctl on
| netbsd...
The problem is that some archs with different machine_archs use the
same toolchain and can't be told apart.
christos
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
To: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:30:37 +1000
> | since these binaries are always going to report the same value,
> | i suspect that fixing arm/param.h to report the right value
> | depending on the compiler options would fix the problem without
> | having to patch every program that uses them to use sysctl on
> | netbsd...
>
> The problem is that some archs with different machine_archs use the
> same toolchain and can't be told apart.
how so? can't the header file define MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH based
upon the compiler defines? eg, from sparc64/param.h:
#ifdef __arch64__
#define _MACHINE sparc64
#define MACHINE "sparc64"
#define _MACHINE_ARCH sparc64
#define MACHINE_ARCH "sparc64"
#define MID_MACHINE MID_SPARC64
#else
#define _MACHINE sparc
#define MACHINE "sparc"
#define _MACHINE_ARCH sparc
#define MACHINE_ARCH "sparc"
#define MID_MACHINE MID_SPARC
#endif
.mrg.
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:36:32 -0700
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:35 AM, matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-arm/48215; it has been noted =
by GNATS.
>=20
> From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
> To: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
> Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
> netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent =
NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:30:37 +1000
>=20
>> | since these binaries are always going to report the same value,
>> | i suspect that fixing arm/param.h to report the right value
>> | depending on the compiler options would fix the problem without
>> | having to patch every program that uses them to use sysctl on
>> | netbsd...
>>=20
>> The problem is that some archs with different machine_archs use the
>> same toolchain and can't be told apart.
>=20
> how so? can't the header file define MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH based
> upon the compiler defines? eg, from sparc64/param.h:
>=20
> #ifdef __arch64__
> #define _MACHINE sparc64
> #define MACHINE "sparc64"
> #define _MACHINE_ARCH sparc64
> #define MACHINE_ARCH "sparc64"
> #define MID_MACHINE MID_SPARC64
> #else
> #define _MACHINE sparc
> #define MACHINE "sparc"
> #define _MACHINE_ARCH sparc
> #define MACHINE_ARCH "sparc"
> #define MID_MACHINE MID_SPARC
> #endif
For evbearm & evbearmv5, there is nothing to distinguish them.
Ditto for evbearmhf & evbearmv5hf.=
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
To: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
Cc: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:04:14 +1000
> For evbearm & evbearmv5, there is nothing to distinguish them.
> Ditto for evbearmhf & evbearmv5hf.
so there's no way to application code to know what sort of
compilation environment is available?
that seems like a bug to me.
.mrg.
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:30:11 +0000
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:20:01AM +0000, matthew green wrote:
> > The build inherits MACHINE_ARCH from the environment, which gets it
> > from the nbmake wrapper. If it's wrong there, that seems like a bug.
>
> this has to do with the value exportd by <sys/param.h>, not
> the value set by the build.
external/bsd/pkg_install/sbin/pkg_add/Makefile has
CPPFLAGS+= -DMACHINE_ARCH=\"${MACHINE_ARCH}\"
and it seems to me that overriding this is a bug.
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 04:21:48 +0000
not sent to gnats (all PR traffic should be sent to gnats-bugs; it
remails)
------
From: Moritz Wilhelmy <mw+netbsd@barfooze.de>
To: port-arm-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, ryoon@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-arm/48215: pkg_add fails on recent NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el
current
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:40:15 +0200
Alright, after a long time of debugging it seems the situation is as
follows:
* The pkg_install Makefile adds -DMACHINE_ARCH=\"${MACHINE_ARCH}\" to the
CC flags, where MACHINE_ARCH is the right value of earmhf.
* the pkg_add code pulls in param.h which undefs MACHINE_ARCH and
replaces it by "earm".
Also I don't understand why MACHINE_ARCH is set to several different
values depending on _KERNEL. Can someone please explain this to me?
Also port-arm/48267 is a duplicate of port-arm/48215, so please close
it. Sorry about that.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bsiegert@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 10:13:38 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
This was a long time ago. Still an issue?
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 02:38:05 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
two-year feedback timeout
>Unformatted:
(Contact us)
$NetBSD: gnats-precook-prs,v 1.4 2018/12/21 14:20:20 maya Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.9 2014/08/02 14:16:04 spz Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2017
The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Home