NetBSD Problem Report #50892
From gson@gson.org Fri Mar 4 15:03:55 2016
Return-Path: <gson@gson.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "mail.netbsd.org", Issuer "Postmaster NetBSD.org" (verified OK))
by mollari.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01CF7ABF5
for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:03:55 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20160304150349.1FE1474467E@guava.gson.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:03:49 +0200 (EET)
From: gson@gson.org
Reply-To: gson@gson.org
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: devel/boost-libs fails to build on NetBSD 6.1.5
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.95
>Number: 50892
>Category: pkg
>Synopsis: devel/boost-libs fails to build on NetBSD 6.1.5
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: pkg-manager
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Mar 04 15:05:00 +0000 2016
>Closed-Date: Mon Aug 27 14:43:57 +0000 2018
>Last-Modified: Mon Aug 27 14:43:57 +0000 2018
>Originator: Andreas Gustafsson
>Release: NetBSD 6.1.5
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD
Architecture: x86_64
Machine: amd64
>Description:
Building devel/boost-libs on NetBSD/amd64 6.1.5 fails. Here is the
end of the output from running "make":
gcc.archive bin.v2/libs/wave/build/gcc-4.5.3/release/link-static/threading-multi/libboost_wave.a
common.copy stage/lib/libboost_wave.a
...failed updating 18 targets...
...skipped 8 targets...
...updated 927 targets...
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/devel/boost-libs
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/devel/boost-libs
Grepping the output for the string "error:" produces:
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument_factory.hpp:56:13: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param_name) << source'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument_factory.hpp:147:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param_name) << source'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/parameter.hpp:265:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_param_spec() << "Parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/parameter.hpp:269:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_param_spec() << "Parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:140:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_cla_id() << "End of parameters indicator can only consist of prefix characters."'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:145:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_cla_id() << "Negation prefix can only consist of prefix characters."'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/env/fetch.hpp:81:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param->.p_name) << "Missing an argument value for the parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:99:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::access_to_missing_argument() << "There is no argument provided for parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument.hpp:106:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch() << "Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument_factory.hpp:56:13: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param_name) << source'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/argument_factory.hpp:147:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param_name) << source'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/parameter.hpp:265:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_param_spec() << "Parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/parameter.hpp:269:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_param_spec() << "Parameter "'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:140:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_cla_id() << "End of parameters indicator can only consist of prefix characters."'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:145:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'boost::runtime::invalid_cla_id() << "Negation prefix can only consist of prefix characters."'
./boost/test/utils/runtime/env/fetch.hpp:81:9: error: no match for 'operator<<' in '(boost::runtime::format_error)(param->.p_name) << "Missing an argument value for the parameter "'
Building on NetBSD 7.0 succeeds.
>How-To-Repeat:
cd /usr/pkgsrc/devel/boost-libs
make
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
From: Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?= <ef@math.uni-bonn.de>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:56:25 +0200
FWIW, the issue seems to be known to the boost developers as Ticket #12093 (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12093).
The analysis is ``<C++ foo I don't understand> I am not sure about what is stated in the standard, but my feeling is that this is a compiler defect.''
Also, the error doesn't occur if you omit the ``test'' component:
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/devel/boost-libs/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.41 Makefile
--- Makefile 28 Feb 2016 23:54:11 -0000 1.41
+++ Makefile 1 Aug 2016 15:25:21 -0000
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
INSTALLATION_DIRS+= lib
BJAM_ARGS+= --without-python
+BJAM_ARGS+= --without-test
PLIST_VARS+= context log long_double_math
.if ${OPSYS} == "NetBSD" && ((${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc64") || (!empty(MACHINE_ARCH:Mearm*) && !empty(PKGSRC_COMPILER:Mgcc)))
Index: PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/devel/boost-libs/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.28 PLIST
--- PLIST 27 Dec 2015 12:41:42 -0000 1.28
+++ PLIST 1 Aug 2016 15:25:21 -0000
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@
${PLIST.long_double_math}lib/libboost_math_tr1l.a
${PLIST.long_double_math}lib/libboost_math_tr1l.so
${PLIST.long_double_math}lib/libboost_math_tr1l.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
-lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.a
-lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so
-lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
+@comment lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.a
+@comment lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so
+@comment lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
lib/libboost_program_options.a
lib/libboost_program_options.so
lib/libboost_program_options.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
lib/libboost_system.a
lib/libboost_system.so
lib/libboost_system.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
-lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a
+@comment lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a
lib/libboost_thread.a
lib/libboost_thread.so
lib/libboost_thread.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@
lib/libboost_type_erasure.a
lib/libboost_type_erasure.so
lib/libboost_type_erasure.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
-lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a
-lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so
-lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
+@comment lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a
+@comment lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so
+@comment lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
lib/libboost_wave.a
lib/libboost_wave.so
lib/libboost_wave.so.${BOOST_VERSION}
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:18:08 +0000
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:00:01PM +0000, Edgar Fu? wrote:
> FWIW, the issue seems to be known to the boost developers as Ticket #12093 (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12093).
> The analysis is ``<C++ foo I don't understand> I am not sure about what is stated in the standard, but my feeling is that this is a compiler defect.''
>
> Also, the error doesn't occur if you omit the ``test'' component:
> [snip]
Given that fixing it ourselves is unlikely (it being boost) is it
better to handle this by disabling the test component on netbsd-6, or
by setting GCC_REQD?
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@gson.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: pkg-manager@netbsd.org,
gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,
gson@gson.org
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:29:04 +0300
David Holland wrote:
> Given that fixing it ourselves is unlikely (it being boost) is it
> better to handle this by disabling the test component on netbsd-6, or
> by setting GCC_REQD?
I vote for disabling the test component on netbsd-6.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, gson@gson.org
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:12:33 +0000
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:30:01AM +0000, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> > Given that fixing it ourselves is unlikely (it being boost) is it
> > better to handle this by disabling the test component on netbsd-6, or
> > by setting GCC_REQD?
>
> I vote for disabling the test component on netbsd-6.
This does not seem to have been done; would you go ahead, if it's
still needed?
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@gson.org>
To: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:46:30 +0200
David Holland wrote:
> > I vote for disabling the test component on netbsd-6.
>
> This does not seem to have been done; would you go ahead, if it's
> still needed?
Alas, I no longer have a suitable netbsd-6 system to test it on.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, gson@gson.org
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:09:58 +0000
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:50:01AM +0000, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> > > I vote for disabling the test component on netbsd-6.
> >
> > This does not seem to have been done; would you go ahead, if it's
> > still needed?
>
> Alas, I no longer have a suitable netbsd-6 system to test it on.
Neither do I.
I guess I'll leave the PR here until -6 is EOL'd, in case somebody
wants to take it up...
--
David A. Holland
dholland@netbsd.org
From: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@gson.org>
To: dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org
Cc: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg/50892
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:06:53 +0200
On Feb 20, David Holland wrote:
> > Alas, I no longer have a suitable netbsd-6 system to test it on.
>
> Neither do I.
>
> I guess I'll leave the PR here until -6 is EOL'd, in case somebody
> wants to take it up...
I managed to turn an unsuitable netbsd-6.1.5 system into a suitable
one by provisioning additional disk space, but I'm still unable to
test, because boost-libs depends on textproc/icu, which fails to build:
number_decimalquantity.cpp:387:40: error: 'round' is not a member of 'std'
auto result = static_cast<int64_t>(std::round(n));
^
--
Andreas Gustafsson, gson@gson.org
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: gson@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:43:57 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
NetBSD 6.1.5 is EOL
>Unformatted:
(Contact us)
$NetBSD: query-full-pr,v 1.43 2018/01/16 07:36:43 maya Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.9 2014/08/02 14:16:04 spz Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2017
The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Home