NetBSD Problem Report #29861

From yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp  Sat Apr  2 06:30:34 2005
Return-Path: <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
Received: from yamt.dyndns.org (FLA1Aah135.kng.mesh.ad.jp [61.193.101.135])
	by narn.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4282063B11A
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Sat,  2 Apr 2005 06:30:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <1112423423.031060.7184.nullmailer@yamt.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:30:23 +0900
From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp
Reply-To: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: sh eval weird behaviour
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.95

>Number:         29861
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       sh eval weird behaviour
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    bin-bug-people
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Apr 02 06:31:00 +0000 2005
>Closed-Date:    Thu Jan 01 20:27:48 +0000 2015
>Last-Modified:  Thu Jan 01 20:27:48 +0000 2015
>Originator:     YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
>Release:        NetBSD 3.99.3
>Organization:

>Environment:


System: NetBSD kaeru 3.99.3 NetBSD 3.99.3 (build.kaeru.nodebug) #28: Fri Apr 1 22:14:42 JST 2005 takashi@kaeru:/usr/home/takashi/work/kernel/build.kaeru.nodebug i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
	for the following commands, /bin/sh shows the different results,
	depending on with or without eval.

	$ ((set -e; false; echo X); echo Y)
	Y
	$ eval '((set -e; false; echo X); echo Y)'
	X
	Y

>How-To-Repeat:
	see the above and src/regress/bin/sh/set_e.sh.
>Fix:


>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:
From: Miwa Susumu <miwarin@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/29861
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:35:41 +0900

 Not reproduce.
 Is Fixed ?

 $ ((set -e; false; echo X); echo Y)
 Y
 $ eval '((set -e; false; echo X); echo Y)'
 Y

 $ uname -rsm
 NetBSD 6.1.5 i386

 -- 
 miwarin

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 20:27:48 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Yup, fixed.

huh, this is an issue I had been following (this PR is not the only
time it's come up) and I don't remember it getting fixed. must have
missed it.

thanks for noticing :-)


>Unformatted:

Home	PR Database Search