NetBSD Problem Report #32828

From www@netbsd.org  Tue Feb 14 00:14:37 2006
Return-Path: <www@netbsd.org>
Received: by narn.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 31301)
	id 2A8C263B879; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20060214001437.2A8C263B879@narn.netbsd.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: hpxchan@gmail.com
Reply-To: hpxchan@gmail.com
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: NetBSD amd64 fails to boot on HP L2000 series laptop
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         32828
>Category:       port-amd64
>Synopsis:       NetBSD amd64 fails to boot on HP L2000 series laptop
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    joerg
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Feb 14 00:15:01 +0000 2006
>Closed-Date:    Wed Nov 11 14:24:55 +0000 2009
>Last-Modified:  Wed Nov 11 14:24:55 +0000 2009
>Originator:     Chandler May
>Release:        NetBSD-3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
I have a Hewlett-Packard L2000 series ("Livestrong Edition") laptop I'd like to install NetBSD on. I've been able to successfully boot and install
FreeBSD 6.0, OpenBSD 3.8, and Linux 2.6.* by turning ACPI support off at the bootloader, so I suspect doing the same for NetBSD 3.0 will allow me to boot (however I am not sure how to do this).

It currently hangs booting immediately after the following line:
ioapic0: enabling

Also, after successfully installing FreeBSD, I could boot the default option by setting the following flags in device.hints beforehand:
hint.apic.0.disabled="1"
hint.sio.0.disabled="1"
hint.sio.1.disabled="1"
>How-To-Repeat:
(1) Obtain HP L2000 series laptop
(2) Boot NetBSD 2.0.2 or 3.0 (amd64) via CD
>Fix:

>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:

Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->port-amd64-maintainer
Responsible-Changed-By: wiz@netbsd.org
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 22:48:48 +0000
Responsible-Changed-Why:
port-amd64 PR


Responsible-Changed-From-To: port-amd64-maintainer->joerg
Responsible-Changed-By: joerg@narn.netbsd.org
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:59:14 +0000
Responsible-Changed-Why:
ACPI problem.

Can you please test this with a current kernel?


State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: joerg@narn.netbsd.org
State-Changed-When: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:34:24 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Question asked.


From: "Chandler May" <hpxchan@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org, joerg@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-amd64/32828 (NetBSD amd64 fails to boot on HP L2000 series laptop)
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:24:42 -0800

 On Jan 18, 2008 12:59 PM,  <joerg@netbsd.org> wrote:
 > Synopsis: NetBSD amd64 fails to boot on HP L2000 series laptop
 > [....]
 > Can you please test this with a current kernel?

 Sorry, I no longer have much access to that machine. At the moment
 it's half of a country away and is being used for Windows applications
 by a family member. If there is a way to test the current kernel
 without touching the disk, I *might* get a chance to try it sometime
 in March (else, this summer).

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-amd64/32828 (NetBSD amd64 fails to boot on HP L2000
	series laptop)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:41:22 +0100

 On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:25:01AM +0000, Chandler May wrote:
 >  Sorry, I no longer have much access to that machine. At the moment
 >  it's half of a country away and is being used for Windows applications
 >  by a family member. If there is a way to test the current kernel
 >  without touching the disk, I *might* get a chance to try it sometime
 >  in March (else, this summer).

 Just grab the amd64.iso or the boot image from the daily NetBSD builds
 under ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily. Thanks for testing this.

 Joerg

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: joerg@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:24:55 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback time out. A lot of the code has changed, so it is impossible to
determine if this problem is this relevant.


>Unformatted:

Home	PR Database Search