NetBSD Problem Report #38582

From martin@duskware.de  Sun May  4 10:29:18 2008
Return-Path: <martin@duskware.de>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by narn.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C4E63BAB2
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>; Sun,  4 May 2008 10:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20080504014532.08C6F63B8BC@narn.NetBSD.org>
Date: Sun,  4 May 2008 01:45:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: ad@netbsd.org
Reply-To: ad@netbsd.org
To: netbsd-bugs-owner@NetBSD.org
Subject: if_ti.o is too large
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         38582
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       if_ti.o is too large
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    kern-bug-people
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun May 04 10:30:01 +0000 2008
>Closed-Date:    Sat Dec 31 04:35:35 +0000 2022
>Last-Modified:  Sat Dec 31 04:35:35 +0000 2022
>Originator:     Andrew Doran
>Release:        4.99.62
>Organization:
The NetBSD Project
>Environment:
amd64
>Description:
$ ls -l if_ti.o
-rw-r--r--  1 ad  staff  194152 May  2 23:55 if_ti.o

>How-To-Repeat:
Notice that kernels are getting fat.

>Fix:
$ gzip -9 if_ti.o && ls -l if_ti.o.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 ad  staff  65828 May  2 23:55 if_ti.o.gz

Maybe some other kind of coding on the firmware would do better.
zlib seems to cut it down quite a bit.

>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 04:35:35 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Duplicate (effectively) of 38576, same bloat problem in another driver.
We don't need to keep two PRs open for this.


>Unformatted:

NetBSD Home
NetBSD PR Database Search

(Contact us) $NetBSD: gnats-precook-prs,v 1.4 2018/12/21 14:20:20 maya Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.9 2014/08/02 14:16:04 spz Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2017 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.