NetBSD Problem Report #39886

From cheusov@tut.by  Sun Nov  9 17:36:40 2008
Return-Path: <cheusov@tut.by>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by narn.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AE563B8C7
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>; Sun,  9 Nov 2008 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <s931vxkreba.fsf@chen.chizhovka.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:37:13 +0200
From: cheusov@tut.by
Reply-To:
To: gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org
Subject: GNU emacs and XEmacs modules should not conflict
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.95

>Number:         39886
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       GNU emacs and XEmacs modules should not conflict
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Nov 09 17:40:00 +0000 2008
>Originator:     cheusov@tut.by
>Release:        NetBSD 4.0_STABLE
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD chen.chizhovka.net 4.0_STABLE NetBSD 4.0_STABLE (GENERIC) #3: Sun Oct 19 20:54:51 EEST 2008 cheusov@chen.chizhovka.net:/srv/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
Most emacs modules/packages have no common files when they are built
with EMACS_TYPE=xemacsXXX and EMACS_TYPE=emacsYY

But they are always marked as conflicting by default.

I think this mark should be removed and really conflicting packages
should be either marked as such individually or conflict should be
resolved homehow.

Full description of the problem with a proof of the above statement
is available here.

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2008/11/03/msg001935.html

>Fix:

Problematic code is here: editors/emacs/modules.mk

NetBSD Home
NetBSD PR Database Search

(Contact us) $NetBSD: query-full-pr,v 1.39 2013/11/01 18:47:49 spz Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.8 2006/05/07 09:23:38 tsutsui Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.