NetBSD Problem Report #43321

From www@NetBSD.org  Tue May 18 10:46:31 2010
Return-Path: <www@NetBSD.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by www.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868F863B879
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20100518104631.160CB63B873@www.NetBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:46:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: pooka@iki.fi
Reply-To: pooka@iki.fi
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: puffs advlock is broken
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         43321
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       puffs advlock is broken
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    kern-bug-people
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue May 18 10:50:00 +0000 2010
>Closed-Date:    Tue May 03 13:28:04 +0000 2011
>Last-Modified:  Tue May 03 13:28:04 +0000 2011
>Originator:     Antti Kantee
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
The puffs interface does not allow a file server to correctly
implement advisory locking, nor does puffs implement the VOP
in the kernel.
>How-To-Repeat:
vi /puffs/file
>Fix:
SMOP (with a few tricky details).  I keep planning to implement this.
At least now I'll have a PR nagging me about it.

>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: pooka@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:17:50 +0200
State-Changed-Why:
kefren added support for the kernel lf_advlock() policy.
Support for a server-based policy is still missing.


State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: manu@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Tue, 03 May 2011 13:28:04 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
advlock support was committed to -current


>Unformatted:

Home	PR Database Search