NetBSD Problem Report #43406

From www@NetBSD.org  Wed Jun  2 13:23:54 2010
Return-Path: <www@NetBSD.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by www.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7186C63B90A
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Wed,  2 Jun 2010 13:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20100602132354.3C02963B8FF@www.NetBSD.org>
Date: Wed,  2 Jun 2010 13:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
From: obata@lins.jp
Reply-To: obata@lins.jp
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Package name conflict with emulator/fuse and filesystems/fuse
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         43406
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       Package name conflict with emulator/fuse and filesystems/fuse
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jun 02 13:25:00 +0000 2010
>Originator:     OBATA Akio
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
pkgsrc-current / pkgsrc-2010Q1
>Description:
emulator/fuse and filesystems/fuse both use same package name "fuse".
>How-To-Repeat:
Maybe unwanted update with binary package.
emulator/fuse is 0.10.0.2nb1, whereas filesystems/fuse is 2.5.2,
so maybe update from emulator/fuse to filesystem/fuse with binary package.

pkg-vulnerability have following line:
 fuse<2.8.2 security-bypass http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-0789
It's for filesystems/fuse, but also result in unwanted caution to
emulators/fuse.
>Fix:
Either of them should be renamed.

NetBSD Home
NetBSD PR Database Search

(Contact us) $NetBSD: query-full-pr,v 1.39 2013/11/01 18:47:49 spz Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.8 2006/05/07 09:23:38 tsutsui Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.