NetBSD Problem Report #44244

From www@NetBSD.org  Thu Dec 16 17:41:55 2010
Return-Path: <www@NetBSD.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [204.152.190.11])
	by www.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DD063BECA
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20101216174155.27F2F63BCAC@www.NetBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: rga@sdf.lonestar.org
Reply-To: rga@sdf.lonestar.org
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc 20010Q3)
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         44244
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc 20010Q3)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Dec 16 17:45:03 +0000 2010
>Closed-Date:    
>Last-Modified:  Wed Dec 29 08:10:03 +0000 2010
>Originator:     Ruben Gonzalez Arnau
>Release:        Sorry, GNU/Linux 2.6.35
>Organization:
non profit
>Environment:
Linux foo 2.6.35.4 #14 SMP Wed Dec 15 15:22:30 CET 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>Description:
crawl does not compile since does not find db 1.5 compatibiliy.

checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g root
checking if we may use "-I/usr/include"... no
checking for libevent... yes
checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility... configure: error: Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility not found
*** Error code 1
>How-To-Repeat:
cd /usr/pkgsrc/www/crawl && bmake 
>Fix:
Finded by ASau (thank you!) on #pkgsrc 

As you can see, does not check any /usr/pkg/include/dbX

+ echo 'configure:2583: checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility'
+ echo -n 'checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility... '
checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility... + test '' = set
+ for dir in '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.1' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.0' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB' '${prefix}/db' '${prefix}'
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB.3.1/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB.3.1/include/db.h
+ for dir in '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.1' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.0' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB' '${prefix}/db' '${prefix}'
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB.3.0/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB.3.0/include/db.h
+ for dir in '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.1' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.0' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB' '${prefix}/db' '${prefix}'
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/pkg/BerkeleyDB/include/db.h
+ for dir in '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.1' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.0' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB' '${prefix}/db' '${prefix}'
+ test -f /usr/pkg/db/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/pkg/db/include/db.h
+ for dir in '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.1' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB.3.0' '${prefix}/BerkeleyDB' '${prefix}/db' '${prefix}'
+ test -f /usr/pkg/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/pkg/include/db.h
+ test x = x
+ test -f /usr/include/db2/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/include/db1/db.h
+ test -f /usr/include/db_185.h
+ test -f /usr/include/db.h
+ test x = x
+ echo 'configure:2698: error: Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility not found'

>Release-Note:

>Audit-Trail:
From: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: PR/44244 CVS commit: pkgsrc/www/crawl
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:17:28 +0000

 Module Name:	pkgsrc
 Committed By:	obache
 Date:		Tue Dec 21 08:17:28 UTC 2010

 Modified Files:
 	pkgsrc/www/crawl: Makefile

 Log Message:
 Not to use BDB check in configure.
 Fixes PR#44244.


 To generate a diff of this commit:
 cvs rdiff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 pkgsrc/www/crawl/Makefile

 Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
 copyright notices on the relevant files.

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:33:40 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Did the commit fix it?


From: Ruben Gonzalez Arnau <rga@sdf.lonestar.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:29:33 +0100

 On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:33:41AM +0000, dholland@NetBSD.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc 20010Q3)
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
 > State-Changed-When: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:33:40 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Did the commit fix it?
 > 
 > 
 > 

 Yes, sorry delay.

 Your commit fix DB problem (I think that fixes other packages with the same problem too), but it has another error not related during compile session.

 earth:/usr/pkgsrc/www/crawl#  bmake
 => Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20080510
 => Bootstrap dependency tnftp-[0-9]*: found tnftp-20070806
 ===> Building for crawl-0.4nb8
 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./compat -I/usr/pkg/include
 -DHAVE_DB_185_H -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/pkg/include/db4 -I/usr/include 
 -Wall -c dns.c
 dns.c: In function ‘dns_read’: 
 dns.c:155:5: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
 dns.c: In function ‘dns_resolve’: 
 dns.c:565:14: error: ‘EAI_NODATA’ undeclared (first use in this
 function) 
 dns.c:565:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
 each function it appears in
 *** Error code 1


 A simple workaround to compile, after that, compiles and works fine, thank you :)

 vim workdir/pkgsrc/www/crawl/work/crawl-0.4/dns.c

 Line 42,

 +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
         if (res != EAI_NODATA)
                 return (-1);
 +#endif

 -- 
 rga@sdf.lonestar.org

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: dholland@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:48:04 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
That worked, but another problem has appeared.


From: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:58:34 +0900

 On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:30:05 +0900, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau <rga@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:

 >  A simple workaround to compile, after that, compiles and works fine, thank you :)
 > vim workdir/pkgsrc/www/crawl/work/crawl-0.4/dns.c
 > Line 42,
 > +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
 >          if (res != EAI_NODATA)
 >                  return (-1);
 >  +#endif

 I feel that EAI_NONAME should be checked if EAI_NODATA is not defined.

 -- 
 OBATA Akio / obache@NetBSD.org

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:05:29 +0000

 On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:30:05AM +0000, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
  >  vim workdir/pkgsrc/www/crawl/work/crawl-0.4/dns.c
  >  
  >  Line 42,
  >  
  >  +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
  >          if (res != EAI_NODATA)
  >                  return (-1);
  >  +#endif

 That's not the right fix -- at a minimum it ought to be

   +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
           if (res != EAI_NODATA)
                   return (-1);
   +else
   +       return (-1);
   +#endif

 but I don't think that's right either; EAI_NODATA ought to be defined.
 Does

    % find /usr/include -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep EAI_NODATA

 print anything?

 Also, when you compile, does anything like -D_POSIX_SOURCE or
 -D_GNU_SOURCE or similar appear on the compilation lines? It doesn't
 for me, but the most likely cause of this problem, especially on
 Linux, is that glibc is hiding the EAI_* definitions because it thinks
 it's been asked to be strictly compliant with some outdated standard.

 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland@netbsd.org

From: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:35:01 +0900

 On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:10:06 +0900, David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org> wrote:

 >  but I don't think that's right either; EAI_NODATA ought to be defined.

 EAI_NODATA is obsolete (not in RFC 3493).
 For example, it was removed from FreeBSD.

 #if 0
 /* obsoleted */
 #define EAI_NODATA	7	/* no address associated with hostname */
 #endif

From: Ruben Gonzalez Arnau <rga@sdf.lonestar.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 07:25:14 +0100

 On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:10:06AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/44244; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 >  20010Q3))
 > Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:05:29 +0000
 > 
 >  On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:30:05AM +0000, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
 >   >  vim workdir/pkgsrc/www/crawl/work/crawl-0.4/dns.c
 >   >  
 >   >  Line 42,
 >   >  
 >   >  +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
 >   >          if (res != EAI_NODATA)
 >   >                  return (-1);
 >   >  +#endif
 >  
 >  That's not the right fix -- at a minimum it ought to be
 >  
 >    +#ifdef EAI_NODATA
 >            if (res != EAI_NODATA)
 >                    return (-1);
 >    +else
 >    +       return (-1);
 >    +#endif
 >  
 >  but I don't think that's right either; EAI_NODATA ought to be defined.
 >  Does
 >  
 >     % find /usr/include -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep EAI_NODATA
 >  
 >  print anything?
 >  
 >  Also, when you compile, does anything like -D_POSIX_SOURCE or
 >  -D_GNU_SOURCE or similar appear on the compilation lines? It doesn't
 >  for me, but the most likely cause of this problem, especially on
 >  Linux, is that glibc is hiding the EAI_* definitions because it thinks
 >  it's been asked to be strictly compliant with some outdated standard.
 >  
 >  -- 
 >  David A. Holland
 >  dholland@netbsd.org
 >  

 Hello,

 I don't get -D_GNU_SOURCE or D_POSIX_SOURCE too.

 That's my output:

 $ find /usr/include -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep EAI_NODATA
 /usr/include/netdb.h:#  define EAI_NODATA         -5    /* No address
 associated with NAME.  */

 /usr/include/netdb.h
 ---
 # ifdef __USE_GNU
 #  define EAI_NODATA      -5    /* No address associated with NAME.  */
 #  define EAI_ADDRFAMILY  -9    /* Address family for NAME not
 #  supported.  */
 #  define EAI_INPROGRESS  -100  /* Processing request in progress.  */
 #  define EAI_CANCELED    -101  /* Request canceled.  */
 #  define EAI_NOTCANCELED -102  /* Request not canceled.  */
 #  define EAI_ALLDONE     -103  /* All requests done.  */
 #  define EAI_INTR        -104  /* Interrupted by a signal.  */
 #  define EAI_IDN_ENCODE  -105  /* IDN encoding failed.  */
 # endif

 Well, maybe it's good idea to check both #ifdef EAI_NODATA and #ifdef EAI_NONAME That's an idea only.

 -- 
 rga@sdf.lonestar.org

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs@netbsd.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/44244 (crawl does not compile using GNU/Linux  (pkgsrc
 20010Q3))
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:05:53 +0000

 On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:35:01AM +0000, OBATA Akio wrote:
  >  >  but I don't think that's right either; EAI_NODATA ought to be defined.
  >  
  >  EAI_NODATA is obsolete (not in RFC 3493).
  >  For example, it was removed from FreeBSD.

 blah. I guess I don't know what I'm talking about then... so never mind.

 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland@netbsd.org

>Unformatted:

Home	PR Database Search