NetBSD Problem Report #9852
Received: (qmail 13769 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2000 13:07:16 -0000
Message-Id: <200004101307.GAA01898@nbwww.isc.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: daishi@axlight.com
Reply-To: daishi@axlight.com
To: gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org
Subject: Duo support
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0
>Number: 9852
>Category: port-mac68k
>Synopsis: Duo support
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: port-mac68k-maintainer
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 10 13:08:00 +0000 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified: Sun May 12 13:32:33 +0000 2024
>Originator: Daishi Kato
>Release: current-20000318
>Organization:
Japan
>Environment:
NetBSD duo230.axlight.com 1.4X NetBSD 1.4X (DUOTEST) #1: Thu Apr 6 05:47:32 PDT 2000 root@duo230.axlight.com:/usr/src/sys.000331/arch/mac68k/compile/DUOTEST mac68k
>Description:
Support for Duo-series.
With the patch it will boot,
and the internal keyboard will work.
The patch is only tested with Duo230.
(Sorry for this short message.)
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
This is the patch.
--- mac68k/locore.s.orig Fri Mar 10 04:31:57 2000
+++ mac68k/locore.s Mon Apr 3 06:34:12 2000
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@
GLOBAL(bletch)
.long 0
+/* to use tt1 instead of tt0 in get_pte() */
+GLOBAL(mac68k_use_tt1)
+ .long 0
+
BSS(esym,4)
ASENTRY_NOPROFILE(start)
@@ -1632,7 +1636,13 @@
lea _ASM_LABEL(longscratch),a0
movl #0x00ff8710,a0@ | Set up FC 1 r/w access
+ tstl _C_LABEL(mac68k_use_tt1)
+ beq Lusett0_1
+ .long 0xf0100c00 | pmove a0@,tt1
+ bra Ldonett0_1
+Lusett0_1:
.long 0xf0100800 | pmove a0@,tt0
+Ldonett0_1:
movl sp@(8),a0 | logical address to look up
movl #0,a1 | clear in case of failure
@@ -1757,7 +1767,13 @@
get_pte_success:
lea _ASM_LABEL(longscratch),a0 | disable tt
movl #0,a0@
+ tstl _C_LABEL(mac68k_use_tt1)
+ beq Lusett0_2
+ .long 0xf0100c00 | pmove a0@,tt1
+ bra Ldonett0_2
+Lusett0_2:
.long 0xf0100800 | pmove a0@,tt0
+Ldonett0_2:
addql #4,sp | return temporary space
rts
--- mac68k/machdep.c.orig Mon Mar 20 04:20:54 2000
+++ mac68k/machdep.c Mon Apr 3 06:38:31 2000
@@ -215,6 +215,9 @@
struct extent *iomem_ex;
int iomem_malloc_safe;
+/* this value is used in locore.s */ /* by daishi */
+extern u_long mac68k_use_tt1;
+
static void identifycpu __P((void));
static u_long get_physical __P((u_int, u_long *));
@@ -2146,6 +2149,8 @@
via_reg(VIA1, vIER) = 0x6f; /* disable VIA1 int */
/* Are we disabling something important? */
via_reg(VIA2, rIER) = 0x7f; /* disable VIA2 int */
+ /* to use tt1 instead of tt0 in get_pte() */ /* by daishi */
+ mac68k_use_tt1 = 1;
break;
case MACH_CLASSQ:
case MACH_CLASSQ2:
--- dev/adb_direct.c.orig Thu Mar 23 04:27:02 2000
+++ dev/adb_direct.c Mon Apr 3 06:34:14 2000
@@ -2104,6 +2104,8 @@
int device;
int nonewtimes; /* times thru loop w/o any new devices */
+ adb_setup_hw_type(); /* setup hardware type */
+
/* Make sure we are not interrupted while building the table. */
/* ints must be on for PB & IOP (at least, for now) */
if (adbHardware != ADB_HW_PB && adbHardware != ADB_HW_IOP)
@@ -2122,8 +2124,6 @@
*/
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
ADBDevTable[i].devType = 0;
-
- adb_setup_hw_type(); /* setup hardware type */
adb_hw_setup(); /* init the VIA bits and hard reset ADB */
--- dev/pm_direct.c.orig Sun Mar 19 04:17:11 2000
+++ dev/pm_direct.c Mon Apr 3 06:34:15 2000
@@ -1066,8 +1066,20 @@
/* wait until the PM interrupt is occured */
delay = 0x80000;
while (adbWaiting == 1) {
+ switch (mac68k_machine.machineid) { /* by daishi only tested with Duo230 */
+ case MACH_MACPB210:
+ case MACH_MACPB230:
+ case MACH_MACPB250:
+ case MACH_MACPB270:
+ case MACH_MACPB280:
+ case MACH_MACPB280C:
+ pm_intr((void *)0);
+ break;
+ default:
if ((via_reg(VIA1, vIFR) & 0x10) == 0x10)
pm_intr((void *)0);
+ break;
+ }
#ifdef PM_GRAB_SI
#if 0
zshard(0); /* grab any serial interrupts */
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: maya@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 19:38:32 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
It looks like the adb part of the patch got committed, but I don't see anything about the pmap part.
What happened with that? was it still a patch you had to locally apply? Thanks.
From: Hauke Fath <hf@spg.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-mac68k-maintainer@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org, maya@NetBSD.org,
daishi@axlight.com
Subject: Re: port-mac68k/9852 (Duo support)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 20:08:15 +0100
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 19:38:33 +0000 (UTC), maya@NetBSD.org wrote:
> It looks like the adb part of the patch got committed, but I don't=20
> see anything about the pmap part.
> What happened with that? was it still a patch you had to locally=20
> apply? Thanks.
It would be helpful if the submitter clarified the (expected)=20
significance of using a different mmu register on the Duo.=20
I have a Duo 280(c), and remember booting it successfully with a=20
(soft-float) kernel post-1.4, but that is with a 68LC040 as opposed to=20
the Duo 230's 68030.
Cheerio,
hauke
--=20
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut f=FCr Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: maya@NetBSD.org
State-Changed-When: Sun, 12 May 2024 13:32:33 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
feedback timeout
>Unformatted:
(Contact us)
$NetBSD: query-full-pr,v 1.47 2022/09/11 19:34:41 kim Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.9 2014/08/02 14:16:04 spz Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2024
The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.