NetBSD Problem Report #59761

From www@netbsd.org  Sun Nov 16 00:57:20 2025
Return-Path: <www@netbsd.org>
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "mail.NetBSD.org", Issuer "mail.NetBSD.org CA" (not verified))
	by mollari.NetBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133EE1A9239
	for <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 00:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <20251116005718.9DADD1A923A@mollari.NetBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 00:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
Reply-To: medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         59761
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    kern-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Nov 16 01:00:00 +0000 2025
>Last-Modified:  Mon Nov 17 21:25:00 +0000 2025
>Originator:     Mike Edwards
>Release:        10.1
>Organization:
N/A
>Environment:
NetBSD netbsd02 10.1 NetBSD 10.1 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Dec 16 13:08:11 UTC 2024  mkrepro@mkrepro.NetBSD.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64

>Description:
dmsetup fails to work, causing lvm to similarly break while attempting to create an LV, though PV and VG creation appear to work.

This is easily seen with dmsetup --version or dmsetup ls:
[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup --version    
Library version:   1.02.40 (2009-11-24)
ioctl version call failed with errno 25

Command failed
[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup ls           
ioctl version call failed with errno 25

Command failed


ktruss reports the ioctl that fails is NETBSD_DM_IOCTL:
  1650   1650 dmsetup  ioctl(0x4, NETBSD_DM_IOCTL, 0x7f7fffd5e1b0) Err#25 ENOTTY

Module 'dm' is loaded:
[ksh] root@netbsd02# modstat dm
NAME                       CLASS    SOURCE   FLAG  REFS    SIZE REQUIRES 
dm                         driver   filesys  -        0   18216 dk_subr

Without checking the source, I can see references to NETBSD_DM_IOCTL in the dm module, as expected:
[ksh] root@netbsd02# grep -r NETBSD_DM_IOCTL /stand/                                                                                                         
Binary file /stand/amd64/10.1/modules/dm/dm.kmod matches

I can't find a reason this ioctl should fail, given that the dm module is indeed loaded, which tells me that this driver appears to have broken at some point.
>How-To-Repeat:
Run dmstat --version or dmstat ls, watch for ioctl call to fail.
>Fix:
Unknown.

>Audit-Trail:
From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 17:24:06 -0000 (UTC)

 medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net writes:

 >This is easily seen with dmsetup --version or dmsetup ls:
 >[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup --version    
 >Library version:   1.02.40 (2009-11-24)
 >ioctl version call failed with errno 25

 >Command failed
 >[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup ls           
 >ioctl version call failed with errno 25


 Can't reproduce that. Please check the output of

    ls -ld /dev/mapper/control

 it should be like this:

 crw-rw----  1 root  operator  194, 0 Sep  7  2022 /dev/mapper/control


 Please also retry the dmsetup commands with two -v flags like:

 # dmsetup -vv --version
 Library version:   1.02.40 (2009-11-24)
 Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 Driver version:    4.16.0

 # dmsetup -vv ls
 Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 Ioctl type  names --- flags 4
 No devices found

 to see if any errors are reported.

From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, 
	medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 18:58:35 +0000

 Well, this is bizarre:
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -ld /dev/mapper/control
 crw-rw----  1 root  operator  0, 0 Nov 15 19:50 /dev/mapper/control

 0,0?  Oddly, dmsetup doesn't agree with ls here:
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup -vv ls
 /dev/mapper/control: Wrong device number: (33, 176) instead of (194, 0)
 Creating device /dev/mapper/control (194, 0)
 Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 ioctl version call failed with errno 25

 Command failed

 Why would ls report 0,0, and dmsetup 33,176?

 One other piece of information that it occurs to me may be relevant:
 This is a pvh vm running under Xen.

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 5:32=E2=80=AFPM Michael van Elst via gnats
 <gnats-admin@netbsd.org> wrote:
 >
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted by GNATS=
 .
 >
 > From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kern=
 el
 > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 17:24:06 -0000 (UTC)
 >
 >  medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net writes:
 >
 >  >This is easily seen with dmsetup --version or dmsetup ls:
 >  >[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup --version
 >  >Library version:   1.02.40 (2009-11-24)
 >  >ioctl version call failed with errno 25
 >
 >  >Command failed
 >  >[ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup ls
 >  >ioctl version call failed with errno 25
 >
 >
 >  Can't reproduce that. Please check the output of
 >
 >     ls -ld /dev/mapper/control
 >
 >  it should be like this:
 >
 >  crw-rw----  1 root  operator  194, 0 Sep  7  2022 /dev/mapper/control
 >
 >
 >  Please also retry the dmsetup commands with two -v flags like:
 >
 >  # dmsetup -vv --version
 >  Library version:   1.02.40 (2009-11-24)
 >  Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 >  Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 >  Driver version:    4.16.0
 >
 >  # dmsetup -vv ls
 >  Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 >  Ioctl type  names --- flags 4
 >  No devices found
 >
 >  to see if any errors are reported.
 >

From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 22:43:34 -0000 (UTC)

 gnats-admin@NetBSD.org ("Mike Edwards via gnats") writes:

 > [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -ld /dev/mapper/control
 > crw-rw----  1 root  operator  0, 0 Nov 15 19:50 /dev/mapper/control
 > 
 > 0,0?  Oddly, dmsetup doesn't agree with ls here:

 0, 0 would be "console". Something is wrong in your /dev directory.


 > Why would ls report 0,0, and dmsetup 33,176?

 The source reveals utter stupidity:

         if (major && buf.st_rdev != MKDEV(major, minor)) {
                 log_verbose("%s: Wrong device number: (%u, %u) instead of "
                             "(%u, %u)", control,
                             MAJOR(buf.st_mode), MINOR(buf.st_mode),
                             major, minor);
 ...

 The check is correct, but then it prints bits from buf.st_mode instead
 of buf.st_rdev.


From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 23:32:32 +0000

 Ok, well, that's funny - there's a bug here, but it's not the one I
 thought it was!

 Then again, there's still something odd:
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 total 48
 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel      4096 Nov 16 18:19 .
 drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel     45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 crw-rw----   1 root  operator   0, 0 Nov 16 18:19 control
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# rm control
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 total 48
 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel   4096 Nov 16 18:21 .
 drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel  45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# mknod -m 660 -u root -g operator control c 194 0
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 total 48
 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel      4096 Nov 16 18:21 .
 drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel     45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 crw-rw----   1 root  operator   0, 0 Nov 16 18:21 control
 [ksh] root@netbsd02#

 Perhaps unusually, I'm using ext2fs here, as it makes it easier to
 mount the vm on the host if needed (Xen dom0 is currently Linux).
 Other nodes in the top-level /dev seem to have correct numbering,
 though I'm finding if I try to create a new copy of one of those nodes
 with mknod, it likewise creates a device with address 0, 0.

 If I recall correctly, a script running on the Linux host created the
 nodes in /dev initially, so that may explain why those nodes have
 correct numbering, but the inability to create a node with anything
 but 0, 0 on the running vm is a bit on the strange side.

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 10:45=E2=80=AFPM Michael van Elst via gnats
 <gnats-admin@netbsd.org> wrote:
 >
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted by GNATS=
 .
 >
 > From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kern=
 el
 > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 22:43:34 -0000 (UTC)
 >
 >  gnats-admin@NetBSD.org ("Mike Edwards via gnats") writes:
 >
 >  > [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -ld /dev/mapper/control
 >  > crw-rw----  1 root  operator  0, 0 Nov 15 19:50 /dev/mapper/control
 >  >
 >  > 0,0?  Oddly, dmsetup doesn't agree with ls here:
 >
 >  0, 0 would be "console". Something is wrong in your /dev directory.
 >
 >
 >  > Why would ls report 0,0, and dmsetup 33,176?
 >
 >  The source reveals utter stupidity:
 >
 >          if (major && buf.st_rdev !=3D MKDEV(major, minor)) {
 >                  log_verbose("%s: Wrong device number: (%u, %u) instead o=
 f "
 >                              "(%u, %u)", control,
 >                              MAJOR(buf.st_mode), MINOR(buf.st_mode),
 >                              major, minor);
 >  ...
 >
 >  The check is correct, but then it prints bits from buf.st_mode instead
 >  of buf.st_rdev.
 >
 >

From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, 
	medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:28:46 +0000

 Confirmed - if I shut down the VM, mount it's fs on the Linux Xen
 host, and mknod the control file from there, it's created correctly,
 and now dmsetup -vv ls works:
 [ksh] root@netbsd02# dmsetup -vv ls
 Ioctl type  version --- flags 4
 Ioctl type  names --- flags 4
 No devices found

 I suppose it'll do as a workaround right now, but the inability to
 create the node from the running netbsd VM is a bit odd.  Perhaps an
 issue with using ext2 for /?

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 11:35=E2=80=AFPM Mike Edwards via gnats
 <gnats-admin@netbsd.org> wrote:
 >
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted by GNATS=
 .
 >
 > From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kern=
 el
 > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 23:32:32 +0000
 >
 >  Ok, well, that's funny - there's a bug here, but it's not the one I
 >  thought it was!
 >
 >  Then again, there's still something odd:
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 >  total 48
 >  drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel      4096 Nov 16 18:19 .
 >  drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel     45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 >  crw-rw----   1 root  operator   0, 0 Nov 16 18:19 control
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02# rm control
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 >  total 48
 >  drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel   4096 Nov 16 18:21 .
 >  drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel  45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02# mknod -m 660 -u root -g operator control c 194 0
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -al
 >  total 48
 >  drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel      4096 Nov 16 18:21 .
 >  drwxr-xr-x  11 root  wheel     45056 Nov 12 22:03 ..
 >  crw-rw----   1 root  operator   0, 0 Nov 16 18:21 control
 >  [ksh] root@netbsd02#
 >
 >  Perhaps unusually, I'm using ext2fs here, as it makes it easier to
 >  mount the vm on the host if needed (Xen dom0 is currently Linux).
 >  Other nodes in the top-level /dev seem to have correct numbering,
 >  though I'm finding if I try to create a new copy of one of those nodes
 >  with mknod, it likewise creates a device with address 0, 0.
 >
 >  If I recall correctly, a script running on the Linux host created the
 >  nodes in /dev initially, so that may explain why those nodes have
 >  correct numbering, but the inability to create a node with anything
 >  but 0, 0 on the running vm is a bit on the strange side.
 >
 >  On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 10:45=3DE2=3D80=3DAFPM Michael van Elst via gnat=
 s
 >  <gnats-admin@netbsd.org> wrote:
 >  >
 >  > The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted by GN=
 ATS=3D
 >  .
 >  >
 >  > From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
 >  > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 >  > Cc:
 >  > Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC k=
 ern=3D
 >  el
 >  > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 22:43:34 -0000 (UTC)
 >  >
 >  >  gnats-admin@NetBSD.org ("Mike Edwards via gnats") writes:
 >  >
 >  >  > [ksh] root@netbsd02# ls -ld /dev/mapper/control
 >  >  > crw-rw----  1 root  operator  0, 0 Nov 15 19:50 /dev/mapper/control
 >  >  >
 >  >  > 0,0?  Oddly, dmsetup doesn't agree with ls here:
 >  >
 >  >  0, 0 would be "console". Something is wrong in your /dev directory.
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >  > Why would ls report 0,0, and dmsetup 33,176?
 >  >
 >  >  The source reveals utter stupidity:
 >  >
 >  >          if (major && buf.st_rdev !=3D3D MKDEV(major, minor)) {
 >  >                  log_verbose("%s: Wrong device number: (%u, %u) instea=
 d o=3D
 >  f "
 >  >                              "(%u, %u)", control,
 >  >                              MAJOR(buf.st_mode), MINOR(buf.st_mode),
 >  >                              major, minor);
 >  >  ...
 >  >
 >  >  The check is correct, but then it prints bits from buf.st_mode instea=
 d
 >  >  of buf.st_rdev.
 >  >
 >  >
 >

From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 01:11:12 -0000 (UTC)

 gnats-admin@NetBSD.org ("Mike Edwards via gnats") writes:

 > Perhaps unusually, I'm using ext2fs here, as it makes it easier to
 > mount the vm on the host if needed (Xen dom0 is currently Linux).


 Looks like ext2fs does not initialize the rdev field for anything.

 -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel      0 Nov 17 02:08 foo
 crw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   0, 0 Nov 17 02:09 bar

 % stat -s foo
 st_dev=4864 st_ino=12 st_mode=0100644 st_nlink=1 st_uid=0 st_gid=0 st_rdev=0 st_size=0 st_atime=1763341722 st_mtime=1763341722 st_ctime=1763341722 st_birthtime=0 st_blksize=1024 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0

 % stat -s bar
 st_dev=4864 st_ino=13 st_mode=020644 st_nlink=1 st_uid=0 st_gid=0 st_rdev=0 st_size=0 st_atime=1763341746 st_mtime=1763341746 st_ctime=1763341746 st_birthtime=0 st_blksize=65536 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0


From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, 
	medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:56:43 -0500

 --0000000000003028f50643cab846
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

 So, we effectively have two bugs here: dmsetup prints garbage, and ext2fs
 does nothing with rdev.

 What's the next step - create two new bugs and close this one?

 Thanks for your help in tracking these down!

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2025, 20:15 Michael van Elst via gnats <
 gnats-admin@netbsd.org> wrote:

 > The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: mlelstv@serpens.de (Michael van Elst)
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
 > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 01:11:12 -0000 (UTC)
 >
 >  gnats-admin@NetBSD.org ("Mike Edwards via gnats") writes:
 >
 >  > Perhaps unusually, I'm using ext2fs here, as it makes it easier to
 >  > mount the vm on the host if needed (Xen dom0 is currently Linux).
 >
 >
 >  Looks like ext2fs does not initialize the rdev field for anything.
 >
 >  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel      0 Nov 17 02:08 foo
 >  crw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   0, 0 Nov 17 02:09 bar
 >
 >  % stat -s foo
 >  st_dev=4864 st_ino=12 st_mode=0100644 st_nlink=1 st_uid=0 st_gid=0
 > st_rdev=0 st_size=0 st_atime=1763341722 st_mtime=1763341722
 > st_ctime=1763341722 st_birthtime=0 st_blksize=1024 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0
 >
 >  % stat -s bar
 >  st_dev=4864 st_ino=13 st_mode=020644 st_nlink=1 st_uid=0 st_gid=0
 > st_rdev=0 st_size=0 st_atime=1763341746 st_mtime=1763341746
 > st_ctime=1763341746 st_birthtime=0 st_blksize=65536 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0
 >
 >
 >

 --0000000000003028f50643cab846
 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 <div dir=3D"auto">So, we effectively have two bugs here: dmsetup prints gar=
 bage, and ext2fs does nothing with rdev.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div di=
 r=3D"auto">What&#39;s the next step - create two new bugs and close this on=
 e?=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Thanks for your=
  help in tracking these down!</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmai=
 l_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, Nov 16, 20=
 25, 20:15 Michael van Elst via gnats &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gnats-admin@netb=
 sd.org">gnats-admin@netbsd.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D=
 "gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding=
 -left:1ex">The following reply was made to PR kern/59761; it has been noted=
  by GNATS.<br>
 <br>
 From: <a href=3D"mailto:mlelstv@serpens.de" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"norefe=
 rrer">mlelstv@serpens.de</a> (Michael van Elst)<br>
 To: <a href=3D"mailto:gnats-bugs@netbsd.org" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noref=
 errer">gnats-bugs@netbsd.org</a><br>
 Cc: <br>
 Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel=
 <br>
 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 01:11:12 -0000 (UTC)<br>
 <br>
 =C2=A0gnats-admin@NetBSD.org (&quot;Mike Edwards via gnats&quot;) writes:<b=
 r>
 <br>
 =C2=A0&gt; Perhaps unusually, I&#39;m using ext2fs here, as it makes it eas=
 ier to<br>
 =C2=A0&gt; mount the vm on the host if needed (Xen dom0 is currently Linux)=
 .<br>
 <br>
 <br>
 =C2=A0Looks like ext2fs does not initialize the rdev field for anything.<br=
 >
 <br>
 =C2=A0-rw-r--r--=C2=A0 1 root=C2=A0 wheel=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 Nov 17 02:0=
 8 foo<br>
 =C2=A0crw-r--r--=C2=A0 1 root=C2=A0 wheel=C2=A0 =C2=A00, 0 Nov 17 02:09 bar=
 <br>
 <br>
 =C2=A0% stat -s foo<br>
 =C2=A0st_dev=3D4864 st_ino=3D12 st_mode=3D0100644 st_nlink=3D1 st_uid=3D0 s=
 t_gid=3D0 st_rdev=3D0 st_size=3D0 st_atime=3D1763341722 st_mtime=3D17633417=
 22 st_ctime=3D1763341722 st_birthtime=3D0 st_blksize=3D1024 st_blocks=3D0 s=
 t_flags=3D0<br>
 <br>
 =C2=A0% stat -s bar<br>
 =C2=A0st_dev=3D4864 st_ino=3D13 st_mode=3D020644 st_nlink=3D1 st_uid=3D0 st=
 _gid=3D0 st_rdev=3D0 st_size=3D0 st_atime=3D1763341746 st_mtime=3D176334174=
 6 st_ctime=3D1763341746 st_birthtime=3D0 st_blksize=3D65536 st_blocks=3D0 s=
 t_flags=3D0<br>
 <br>
 <br>
 </blockquote></div>

 --0000000000003028f50643cab846--

From: Mike Edwards <mike@mobile.mirkwood.net>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, 
	medwards-netbsd@mirkwood.net
Subject: Re: kern/59761: dmsetup broken in 10.1 with default GENERIC kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:23:34 -0500

 Sorry about that - the Android gmail client seems to have lost the
 ability to reply in plain text at some point.  Re-sending, in a
 distinctly more readable format:

 So, we effectively have two bugs here: dmsetup prints garbage, and
 ext2fs does nothing with rdev.

 What's the next step - create two new bugs and close this one?

 Thanks for your help in tracking these down!

NetBSD Home
NetBSD PR Database Search

(Contact us) $NetBSD: query-full-pr,v 1.51 2026/08/10 02:28:17 riastradh Exp $
$NetBSD: gnats_config.sh,v 1.10 2026/05/13 22:00:09 riastradh Exp $
Copyright © 1994-2026 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.